Skip to main content

The Padres Haven't Won A Game Yet, But It's Chill





Drake, a very wise man, once told an ex-girlfriend: "I always saw you for what you could've been; ever since you met me like when Chrysler made that one car that looked just like the Bentley... I always saw you for what you could've been."

Indeed, in the wake of an 0-4 start, I find myself thinking about the Padres for what they could've been.

It would've been so easy to think about what would've happened if Eric Hosmer didn't ground in to multiple rally-killing double plays, if Brad Hand didn't implode and cough up a 3-run lead in the 9th against the Brewers, or if Luis Perdomo and Bryan Mitchell could command their respective fastballs.

It's easy, so, so, easy to think about the Padres being 4-0 right now and on top of the division- even if just for this week.

But is this really what we want?

This has been a very, very long rebuild. and a far from perfect one at that- but it's coming to an end. The question now? What's the best way for it to end?

Is it really by having an insipid 81-win season? I mean, we haven't been .500 since the turn of the decade, but .500 it doesn't put us in the playoffs. And more importantly, it won't put the team in the best position to get top prospects through the draft.

Our ability to increase our stockpile of these talents will impact whether the Padres' championship window is 5 years or 10 years.

Perhaps its time to reevaluate what exactly success means. Again, this team isn't supposed to compete this year, and it maybe won't even compete the next year either. "Wins and losses" as we conceive of them don't really matter yet.

What matters is making sure that once these young players arrive, this team will be competitive as long as possible. In light of that, it's time for us to reevaluate what a "successful season" means in the context of this team.

I mean, think about it: what if we don't win any games, but the Padres continue to develop the young talent that we've cultivated, draft a strong cohort of amateur players in June, flip some over-preforming veterans for high-upside prospects, and maybe even secure a high draft pick for 2019?

This has pretty much been the trajectory of the team for the last several years, and don't get me wrong, IT SUCKS. 

But I gotta say, next to winning a World Series, this- the same old song and dance that we've endured for the last 10 years or so- is one of the best possible outcomes imaginable.

Winning by losing isn't fun, but as we've seen from the Dodgers, Cubs, and Astros, it doesn't just work- it works spectacularly.

We've embraced the tank thus far- what difference does one more year make?


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Padres Sign Eric Hosmer

After enduring the most boring baseball offseason in recent memory , the Padres took a metaphorical sledgehammer to the frozen free agent market and signed first baseman Eric Hosmer to an 8 year, 144 million dollar contract- by far the largest and most lucrative in team history . Obviously, the prospect of signing Hosmer has been an extremely polarizing subject amongst Padre fans, but he does indeed have a nice resume; he had an All-Star season last year (25 home runs and 4.1 Fangraphs Wins Above Replacement), won two Gold Gloves, will be a clubhouse leader ( essentially a worthless construct, but whatever lol ), and was a key contributor to the Royals' 2015 World Series-winning team. The Padres even got him for less than we were expecting- the first five years of the contract are front-loaded and will pay him 20 million dollars annually, in addition to a 5 million dollar signing bonus . After the fifth year, Hosmer can opt out of his deal. Should he decide to sta...

Quick Reaction: The Chargers Moving to Los Angeles

So, the Chargers are moving to Los Angeles. Forgive the rant- but these thoughts been gestating for quite some time, so hear me out. It pains me to say this, but.... I'm glad. In fact- I even wish the Spanos family luck: they are about to undertake quite an undesirable task.  While receiving a short-term boost in value from the sheer size of the Los Angeles market, they will have a difficult time building a fan base wherein the have... No. Fans. Whatsoever. The Chargers will be the SIXTH most popular football team behind the Rams (who, as the Chargers new landlord, will siphon off their revenue), Raiders, USC, UCLA, and even the LA Galaxy.  They have alienated their only fan base: the one they have in San Diego- and the Spanos family will be under much pressure from NFL executives to explain why their once-profitable franchise can no longer fill half a stadium. There is a high likelihood that the Chargers pending relocation will be one of the ...

Padre Bloggers Are Idiots

Hey, friends! Baseball is back, and that means it's time to point out how our fellow Padre fans are IDIOTS sometimes- especially our friends at the prosaic Gaslamp Ball, who published this  gem decrying Bill Center's number 19 and 20 entries on his list of Top 100 Padres : current owners Peter Seidler and Ron Folwer. Which, I will be the FIRST to admit.... this might be a little high for the two. But some of the comments the anonymous author of the GLB article makes are incredibly foolish, like this little snippet: " These two have only known failure since coming to Petco Park. They are peddling the same vision that other executives formulated and they’ve only been following this vision for all of 6 months." I mean, yeah, the team still hasn't won yet.  But  this team NEVER wins- we've had 14 winning seasons in a franchise history that spans nearly 50 years! So if we're going to use winning as a benchmark, Seilder and Folwer look like Robert Kraft i...