Skip to main content

The Padres Haven't Won A Game Yet, But It's Chill





Drake, a very wise man, once told an ex-girlfriend: "I always saw you for what you could've been; ever since you met me like when Chrysler made that one car that looked just like the Bentley... I always saw you for what you could've been."

Indeed, in the wake of an 0-4 start, I find myself thinking about the Padres for what they could've been.

It would've been so easy to think about what would've happened if Eric Hosmer didn't ground in to multiple rally-killing double plays, if Brad Hand didn't implode and cough up a 3-run lead in the 9th against the Brewers, or if Luis Perdomo and Bryan Mitchell could command their respective fastballs.

It's easy, so, so, easy to think about the Padres being 4-0 right now and on top of the division- even if just for this week.

But is this really what we want?

This has been a very, very long rebuild. and a far from perfect one at that- but it's coming to an end. The question now? What's the best way for it to end?

Is it really by having an insipid 81-win season? I mean, we haven't been .500 since the turn of the decade, but .500 it doesn't put us in the playoffs. And more importantly, it won't put the team in the best position to get top prospects through the draft.

Our ability to increase our stockpile of these talents will impact whether the Padres' championship window is 5 years or 10 years.

Perhaps its time to reevaluate what exactly success means. Again, this team isn't supposed to compete this year, and it maybe won't even compete the next year either. "Wins and losses" as we conceive of them don't really matter yet.

What matters is making sure that once these young players arrive, this team will be competitive as long as possible. In light of that, it's time for us to reevaluate what a "successful season" means in the context of this team.

I mean, think about it: what if we don't win any games, but the Padres continue to develop the young talent that we've cultivated, draft a strong cohort of amateur players in June, flip some over-preforming veterans for high-upside prospects, and maybe even secure a high draft pick for 2019?

This has pretty much been the trajectory of the team for the last several years, and don't get me wrong, IT SUCKS. 

But I gotta say, next to winning a World Series, this- the same old song and dance that we've endured for the last 10 years or so- is one of the best possible outcomes imaginable.

Winning by losing isn't fun, but as we've seen from the Dodgers, Cubs, and Astros, it doesn't just work- it works spectacularly.

We've embraced the tank thus far- what difference does one more year make?


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

.500

So.......... Raise your hand if you thought that 10 games in to the season, the Padres would be at .500? *waits patiently* Okay, now that we've gotten that out of the way: THE PADRES ARE AT .500! Not only that, but we've won two of our first three series- one of which was against the Giants, who have more or less dominated the NL West this decade. This is the same team that ESPN could not find a single reason to have hope for before the season kicked off. They couldn't be more wrong- this team is overflowing with reasons to hope.  First off, Manny Margot. The man looks like an absolute star in the making- before, we knew that he could be a first division regular easily. The only thing missing was the power- if it developed, he'd be a bona fide five-tool star. And boy, does it look like it's developing. He's currently tied for eighth in the league with three home runs, and has also shown impressive gap power.  Even though small sample size i...

The Padres Overplay Their Hand

The trade deadline came and went- and much to my surprise, Brad Hand is still a Padre. There were so many "Hand" puns to choose from for the title, and after much deliberation, I settled on the poker-related one because I thought it seemed apt for today. BUT... as soon as I started writing, I felt oddly compelled to incorporate the runner-ups into the prose of my article somehow. However, to spare you, the valued reader, from a barrage of subpar wordplay, I'll just list them below and get them out of the way now. Let me know which ones are your favorite! Apparently an arm and a leg is not worth a Hand. AJ Preller decides not to Hand away his best tradable asset for nothing. Is one in the Hand worth two in the bush? AJ Preller rebuffs offers from rival GMs.  Raise your Hand if you thought the Padres wouldn't trade anyone today. Were the Padres demands for a top prospect today a bit heavy Handed? Padres take a Hands-off approach to the deadline today. ...

Projecting the 2017 Padres: Catchers

Over the next week or two, I'll be writing a series of articles that'll focus on projecting the 2017 Padres roster. I'll start with the catchers. In 2016, the Padres have primarily used Derek Norris and Christian Bethancourt behind the plate. Top prospect Austin Hedges, who is in the midst of a very strong season at Triple A El Paso, will likely join the roster in September as a call-up. Norris, the subject of frequent trade rumors throughout the season, was not moved at the deadline, and while he remains a prime August trade candidate, for now, he will remain with the Padres for the rest of the season. Norris has made significant defensive strides this season, and according to Baseball Prospectus, has been a top 10 catcher in terms of defensive runs saved. Offensively, however, Norris has been absolutely abysmal. As of Sunday, Norris' batting average has dropped 10 points below the Mendoza Line, and his Fangraphs wRC+ is 61, nearly 40 points below league averag...